Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://digitalrepository.fccollege.edu.pk/handle/123456789/1194
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSohail, Noman-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Sadia-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Shinho-
dc.contributor.authorNawaz, Muhammad Saqib-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-14T08:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-14T08:21:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.citationDesalination and Water Treatment, January 174 (2020) 71–78 ,,doi: 10.5004/dwt.2020.24866en_US
dc.identifier.otherdoi: 10.5004/dwt.2020.24866-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1194-
dc.descriptionhttps://www.deswater.com/DWT_abstracts/vol_174/174_2020_71.pdfen_US
dc.description.abstractMembrane bioreactor (MBR) is an innovative wastewater treatment technology in which solid and liquid separation is done through membrane. Advantages of MBR technology involves better effluent quality, less foot print and less waste sludge generation. However, membrane biofouling is a major hindrance in the use of MBR that leads to clogging of membranes. Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) encompasses use of carriers moving by aeration that provide surface to microorganism for attached growth. MBBR increases solid retention time, thus slowing down the growth rate of microorganisms. For better results, both technologies MBR and MBBR can be combined together to make moving bed biofilm membrane reactor (MBBMR), a hybrid technique which improves the removal efficiency, lessens sludge generation and minimizes biofouling. This study investigated the biofilm formation and influence of sponge and plastic carriers in MBBR and MBBMR. This study compared removal effi ciency of organic matter and ammonia, effluent production and operational duration as well as waste sludge generation. The results showed COD, BOD and NH4 + –N removal of all technologies above 90%, 95% and 98%, respectively. Hybrid MBBMR with sponge carrier showed the best performance for its high effluent production (34 L/d), longer operational duration (48 d, 193% improvement than simple MBR) and less waste sludge generation (44.2 kg dry sludge/106 L treated wastewater, 56% of MBR) compared with the other technologies, which makes it economically viable among other technologiesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherwww.deswater.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDesalination and Water Treatment, January 174 (2020) 71–78;-
dc.subjectWastewater treatmenten_US
dc.subjectMembrane bioreactor (MBR);en_US
dc.subjectMoving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR);en_US
dc.subjectMoving bed biofilm membrane reactor (MBBMR);en_US
dc.subjectPerformance evaluation;en_US
dc.titlePerformance comparison of three different reactors (MBBR, MBR and MBBMR) for municipal wastewater treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Environmental Science Department

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Desalination and Water Treatment 174 (2020) 71–78.pdf896.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.