Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://digitalrepository.fccollege.edu.pk/handle/123456789/2513
Title: | Post-Truth Politics: An Analysis of News Channel’s Coverage of Political Leaders’ Speeches in Public Processions in Pakistan |
Authors: | Ahmad Aamir, Dr. Adeel Waqas Haider, Syed Akram Soomro, Muhammad Zaffar, Nimra Khalid, Aliza |
Keywords: | Post-Truth Politics, Political Speeches, Content Analysis |
Issue Date: | Jan-2024 |
Publisher: | researchgate.net |
Citation: | Haider, Syed & Soomro, Muhammad & Aamir, Adeel & Khalid, Aliza & Zaffar, Nimra. (2024). Post-Truth Politics: An Analysis of News Channel's Coverage of Political Leaders' Speeches in Public Processions in Pakistan. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters. 3. 151-164. 10.56976/jsom.v3i. |
Abstract: | This study attempts to find out the symptoms of post-truth political culture — politics of emotions rather than rational political debate — in the context of Pakistan. The data in the form of political speeches of politicians from March to July 2022 was taken from You Tube. Political speeches of leaders of four main political parties of Pakistan were analyzed: Imran Khan from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Maryam Nawaz from Pakistan Muslim league (PML-N), Bilawal Bhutto Zardari from Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), and Maulana Fazal Ur Rehman from Jamiat-Ulema-Islam (JUI-F). Using the quantitative content analysis method, the content of 26 speeches, consisting of almost 854 minutes, was broken down into nine categories: policy, facts, false statements, religion, party, promises, performance, public issues, and opposition. Agenda setting theory laid the theoretical approach to observe post-truth dilemmas in political speeches in the public processions. The observed categories were compared across all politicians descriptively: the speeches had 2% facts; 4% false statements; 5% discussion on policy making; 41% arguments attacking the opponent political party; 12% religious’ references; 12% promises; 10% arguments were about the leader’s own political party; 5% were based on their past performance; whilst, only 9% addressed the public issues. |
Description: | This study attempts to find out the symptoms of post-truth political culture — politics of emotions rather than rational political debate — in the context of Pakistan. The data in the form of political speeches of politicians from March to July 2022 was taken from You Tube. Political speeches of leaders of four main political parties of Pakistan were analyzed: Imran Khan from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Maryam Nawaz from Pakistan Muslim league (PML-N), Bilawal Bhutto Zardari from Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), and Maulana Fazal Ur Rehman from Jamiat-Ulema-Islam (JUI-F). Using the quantitative content analysis method, the content of 26 speeches, consisting of almost 854 minutes, was broken down into nine categories: policy, facts, false statements, religion, party, promises, performance, public issues, and opposition. Agenda setting theory laid the theoretical approach to observe post-truth dilemmas in political speeches in the public processions. The observed categories were compared across all politicians descriptively: the speeches had 2% facts; 4% false statements; 5% discussion on policy making; 41% arguments attacking the opponent political party; 12% religious’ references; 12% promises; 10% arguments were about the leader’s own political party; 5% were based on their past performance; whilst, only 9% addressed the public issues. |
URI: | http://digitalrepository.fccollege.edu.pk/handle/123456789/2513 |
Appears in Collections: | Mass Communication Department |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Post_Truth_Politics_An_Analysis_of_News_Channels_Coverage_of_Political_Leaders_Speeches_in_Public_Processions_in_Pakistan[1].pdf | 431.16 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.